JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 7, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Tribunal Superior De Barranquilla

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Auto De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procede solicitud de corrección
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se corrige el numeral tercero de la parte resolutiva del auto 003/15, en el sentido de indicar el nombre correcto del Tribunal al cual se le debe comunicar la decisión adoptada en dicha providencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. CORREGIR el numeral
  2. tercero. de la parte resolutiva del Auto 003 de 2015, el cual quedara asi: "
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR que, por Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, se comuniquen las decisiones adoptadas en esta providencia a la accionante, a la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior de Cali y al Juzgado
  4. Quinto. Administrativo Oral del Circuito de Cali, con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto."
  5. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion que proceda a la comunicacion de este Auto y del Auto 003 de 2015 a la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior de Cali.
  6. Tercero. ORDENAR a la Relatoria de esta corporacion que adjunte copia de la presente providencia al Auto 003 de 2015.
  7. Notifiquese, publiquese, comuniquese e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.