JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 8, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Ministerio De Educacion Nacional

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes de aclaración de la Sentencia C-518/16, presentadas por el Ministerio de Educación y la Comisión Nacional del Servicio Civil.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide RECHAZAR por improcedentes las peticiones de aclaración formuladas.

En un caso, por no advertir una ambigüedad susceptible de ocasionar perplejidad en la intelección de la parte resolutiva del fallo y, en el otro, por presentarse el incidente de manera extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente las solicitudes formuladas por el Ministerio de Educacion Nacional y la Comision Nacional de Servicio Civil, para que se aclare la Sentencia C-518 de 2016.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a los peticionarios, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.