JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 16, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Fanny Jimenez Viuda De Cañon

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Potestad Reglamentaria
  • Naturaleza constitucional
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Presidente De La Republica
  • Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por ser incompatible con la Constitución Política.

En consecuencia, se declaró la nulidad del auto mediante el cual el Juzgado Octavo Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, aplicó el mencionado Decreto y remitió el expediente a los juzgados civiles municipales.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. INAPLICAR, por ser incompatible con la Constitucion Politica, el Articulo 1o del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
  2. Segundo. DECLARAR la nulidad del auto de 7 de mayo de 2002 mediante el cual el Juzgado
  3. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Bogota, aplico el Decreto 1382 de 2000, en su articulo 1o, numeral 1o y remitio el expediente a los juzgados civiles municipales.
  4. Tercero. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado
  5. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Bogota para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.