JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 26, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Comision Del Senado De La Republica
  • Insistencia en citación al Alcalde Mayor de Bogotá
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para decidir excusa de persona natural o jurídica citada por Congreso de la República que se negare a asistir
  • No dar curso a solicitud de insistencia de citación por comisión permanente del Congreso de la República cuando no se cumplan requisitos
Excusa
  • Trámite
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Corte dispone no dar curso a la solicitud formulada por la Comisión Segunda Permanente Constitucional del Senado de la República, relacionada con la excusa presentada por el Alcalde Mayor de Bogotá para asistir a la citación propuesta por la mencionada comisión, por cuanto no se cumplió uno de los requisitos establecidos por el artículo 137 constitucional.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Por las razones expuestas NO DAR CURSO a la solicitud formulada por la Comision Segunda Permanente Constitucional del Senado de la Republica.
  2. Segundo. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.