JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 7, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Luz Teresita Zuluaga Gomez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Improcedencia en la Corte Constitucional por ser competencia del juez de primera instancia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-858/14.

La Corte se pronuncia respecto a la distinción que existe entre las figuras de cumplimiento y desacato y resuelve RECHAZAR la petición formulada, por resultar improcedente.

De manera simultánea informa a la peticionaria que el juez competente para conocer del incidente de desacato, es la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-858 de 2014, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de la presente providencia.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR a la senora Luz Teresita Zuluaga Gomez que el juez competente para conocer del incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-858 de 2014, es la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.