JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 16, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Iris Herazo Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por ser manifiestamente contrario a la Constitución Política.

En consecuencia, se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado a partir del auto por medio del cual el Juzgado Sexto Civil Municipal de Cartagena se declaró incompetente para conocer de la tutela instaurada por la ciudadana de la referencia contra el Gerente del Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Bolívar.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. Inaplicar, por ser contrario a la Constitucion, el articulo 1o del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
  2. Segundo. Declarar la nulidad de todo lo actuado a partir del auto del 8 de abril de 2002, incluido este, por medio del cual el Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Cartagena se declaro incompetente para conocer de la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Iris Herazo Martinez contra el Gerente del Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Bolivar.
  4. Tercero. Ordenar al Juzgado
  5. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Cartagena que asuma de manera inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
  6. Cuarto. Por Secretaria. remitir el expediente al Juzgado
  7. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Cartagena para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.