JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 20, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Fredy Alberto Lara Vs. Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura Atlantico

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Dilata el estudio de la solicitud de tutela
  • Autoridad pública del orden nacional
Debido Proceso Y Acceso A La Administracion De Justicia
  • Vulneración debido al conflicto de competencia
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Tribunal Administrativo del Atlántico que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la solicitud de tutela de la referencia.

La Corte Constitucional resolvió el presente conflicto de competencia advirtiendo que la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, es una colegiatura a la que ni la Constitución Política ni la ley le atribuyó la función de decidir acciones constitucionales, puesto que como ya se explicó sus atribuciones no son de tipo jurisdiccional sino de naturaleza administrativa.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ORDENAR al Tribunal Administrativo del Atlantico, que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la solicitud de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.