JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 16, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Arturo Arias Villa

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por ser manifiestamente contrario a la Constitución Política.

En consecuencia, la Corte declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra DATACRÉDITO DE COMPUTEC S.A., a partir del auto por medio del cual el juzgado 5º Civil del Circuito de Bogotá se declaró incompetente para conocer del asunto, lo anterior, por violación al debido proceso y acceso a la administración de justicia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Inaplicar, por ser manifiestamente contrario a la Constitucion Politica, el articulo 1o del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
  2. Segundo. Por violacion al debido proceso y acceso a la administracion de justicia, declarar la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Arturo Aris Avila contra DATACREDITO DE COMPUTEC S.A., a partir del auto del seis (6) de junio de 2002, incluido este, por medio del cual el juzgado 5o Civil del Circuito de Bogota se declaro incompetente para conocer del asunto.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar al Juzgado 5o Civil del Circuito de Bogota que asuma de manera diligente el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.