JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 16, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Edith Rivera De Rodriguez Vs. Ese Red De Salud Del Centro

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Entre Juzgado Quince Administrativo Del Circuito De Cali Y Juzgado Catorce Civil Municipal De Cali. Superior Jerarquico Comun. Naturaleza Juridica De Entidad Demandada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra E.S.E. Red De Salud Del Centro
  • Competencia de juzgado Administrativo del Circuito
Accion De Tutela Contra Empresa Social Del Estado
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
Empresas Sociales Del Estado
  • Entidad descentralizada por servicios
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por la senora Edith Rivera de Rodriguez contra la Red de Salud del Centro E.S.E, al Juzgado Quince Administrativo del Circuito de Cali, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado Catorce Civil Municipal de Cali, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.