A- de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Angel Urbano Velasquez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inaplicación para el caso
- Aplicación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se inaplicó el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitución Política, en relación con la acción de tutela promovida por la ciudadana de la referencia.
En consecuencia, se decidió el conflicto planteado, en el sentido que el Juzgado Séptimo Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga, es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- PRIMERO. Inaplicar, en relacion con la accion de tutela promovida Mery Barbosa de Gonzales, el articulo 1deg del Decreto 1382 de julio 12 de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitucion Politica conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de este auto.
- SEGUNDO. Decidir el conflicto planteado, en el sentido que el Juzgado
- Septimo. Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga, es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
- TERCERO. Remitir, por medio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, el expediente al Juzgado
- Septimo. Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga, para lo de su competencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.