A- de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Error mecanográfico en parte resolutiva
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se ordenó corregir la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-063/02 para que en el ordinal quinto se incluya el Art. 26 del proyecto de ley objetado.
En consecuencia, dicha parte resolutiva será del siguiente tenor: “Quinto.
Declarar infundada la objeción contra los artículos 13, 14, 18, 19, 26, 32, 36 numeral 2, y 47 del proyecto de ley de la referencia”.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- CORREGIR la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-063 de 2002, para que en el ordinal
- quinto. se incluya el artículo 26 del proyecto de ley objetado. En consecuencia, dicha parte resolutiva será del siguiente tenor:
- "
- Quinto. Declarar infundada la objeción contra los artículos 13, 14, 18, 19, 26, 32, 36 numeral 2, y 47 del proyecto de ley de la referencia".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.