JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 26, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Nora Rocio Moncada Lopera

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito De Medellín Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Antioquia. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito De Medellín Para El Tramite De La Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
  • Función residual de la Corte Constitucional
  • Convocatoria a concurso de docentes implementado por el ICFES
Accion De Tutela Contra El Icfes
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Medellín, en atención a la competencia a prevención fijada por la demandante, para que tramite y decida de forma inmediata la tutela promovida por Nora Rocio Moncada Lopera contra el Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior -ICFES-.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.