JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 21, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jorge Leopoldo Peña Martinez Vs. Ministerio De La Proteccion Social Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Sala Laboral Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bucaramanga Y El Juzgado Septimo Administrativo Del Circuito Judicial De Bucaramanga. Ordena A La Sala Laboral Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bucaramanga Asumir El Conocimiento De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Indicación de tutelados no constituye factor de competencia
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
Juez De Tutela
  • Sólo después de avocado el conocimiento o con posterioridad a la práctica de pruebas puede identificar las autoridades que violaron el derecho fundamental
  • Vinculación de autores del agravio no indicados por el accionante
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • No corresponde a quienes la ejercen determinar a priori contra quienes se dirige la acción de tutela
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Determina la autoridad judicial que debe asumir sin mayores dilaciones
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ORDENAR a la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga que asuma, de forma inmediata, el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.