JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 16, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Franklin Torres Arias Vs. El Fondo De Pensiones Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-791 De 2008 Promovido Ante La Corte Constitucional. Se Decidió No Asumir La Solicitud De Iniciar El Incidente De Desacato Y Se Remitió La Solicitud De La Referencia Al Juzgado Primero Civil Municipal De Neiva.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional en relación con órdenes complejas dictadas para superar el estado de cosas inconstitucional
  • No asume solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato en sentencia T-791/08
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por el señor Franklin Torres Arias.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil Municipal de Neiva la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-791 de 2008, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  4. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.