JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 19, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Viceprocurador General De La Nacion

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El Viceprocurador General de la Nación solicitó a la Corporación ser relevado del deber de rendir concepto en el presente juicio de constitucionalidad, por considerarse impedido para ello por encontrarse incurso en la causal denominada interés directo en la decisión, conforme lo establecido en el artículo 25 del Decreto 2067 de 1991.

La Sala Plena considera que la causal invocada por el Viceprocurador no configura un interés actual, personal y directo que afecte la parcialidad con que debe ejercer su función y la confianza que la ciudadanía debe tener respecto del ejercicio objetivo y desinteresado de las funciones públicas y, por ello, decide NO ACEPTAR el impedimento formulado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ACEPTAR, con base en las razones expresadas en esta providencia, el impedimento manifestado por el senor Viceprocurador General de la Nacion para emitir concepto dentro del expediente D-13476.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de la corporacion que levante la suspension de terminos decretada con ocasion del impedimento propuesto y corra traslado al Viceprocurador General de la Nacion, por el termino restante del otorgado inicialmente al Procurador General de la Nacion, para que rinda el concepto correspondiente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.