JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 12, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Alirio Puentes Sanchez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 porque es incompatible con la Constitución Política, en relación con la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia.

La Corte decidió dirimir la colisión de competencias suscitada entre el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta y el Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Acacías- Meta-, en el sentido de determinar que la competencia para tramitar la tutela le corresponde al mencionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. INAPLICAR, en relacion con la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Carlos Alirio Puentes Sanchez el Articulo 1o del Decreto 1382 de 2000, por ser contrario a la Constitucion Politica conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de este auto.
  2. Segundo. DIRIMIR la colision de competencias suscitada entre el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta, y el Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Acacias- Meta-, en el sentido de determinar que la competencia para tramitar la tutela instaurada por Carlos Alirio Puentes Sanchez, le corresponde al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta.
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR que por la Secretaria General se remita al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.