JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 11, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Alejandro Jose Alvarez Bedoya

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura Vs. Corte Suprema De Justicia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Inaplicación para el caso
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Sala disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación por cuanto se hace imposible surtir segunda instancia
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Decisión respetuosa del principio de doble instancia
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de tutela al Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, Sala Disciplinaria, para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, tal decisión se tomó, además, porque la Sala observó que la determinación tomada por la Sala Disciplinaria en pleno del Consejo Superior es respetuosa del principio constitucional de doble instancia.

Así las cosas, respeta la teleología de las decisiones hasta ahora proferidas por esta Corporación relativas a la garantía de una segunda instancia en el procedimiento de tutela.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, Sala Disciplinaria, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.