JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Emilio Jose Archila Peñalosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Aclaracion Sentencia C-1316/00
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia de aclaración de efectos del fallo
  • Improcedencia de recursos
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-1316/00 formulada por el actor de la referencia, toda vez que la Corte Constitucional ha señalado, en múltiples ocasiones, que contra las sentencias por ella proferidas en ejercicio del control de constitucionalidad encomendado por la Carta Política, no procede ningún recurso, ni petición de aclaración o adición, pues este Tribunal "no puede, por fuera del proceso, cuando ya carece de competencia, añadir ni quitar nada a las providencias que ha proferido" .

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia C-1316 de 2000, formulada por el senor EMILIO JOSE ARCHILA PENALOSA.
  2. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.