JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 22, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Wilson Morales Cuaspud Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Sala Unitaria Civil De Familia Del Tribunal Superior De Pasto Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Nariño. Ordena Remitir A La Sala Unitaria Civil De Familia Del Tribunal Superior De Pasto El Expediente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Afectación de derechos colectivos
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Reglas fijadas determinan autoridad judicial a asumir
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitir a la Sala Unitaria Civil de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pasto el expediente de la accion de tutela promovida por Wilson Morales Cuaspud y Otros, contra el Director de Etnias del Ministerio del Interior, el Gobernador de Narino y el Alcalde Municipal de Ipiales, para que se resuelva de manera inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.