A- de 1998
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Fernando Carrillo Florez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Pluralidad mínima para deliberar y decidir
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se rechazó por improcedente el escrito presentado por el accionante de la referencia, toda vez que en el evento de presentarse y aceptarse el impedimento de uno de los integrantes de la Sala, no es necesario nombrar un conjuez, habida consideración del hecho de que subsiste la pluralidad mínima para deliberar y decidir, en los términos del Art. 54 de la Ley Estatutaria de Administración de Justicia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- R E S U E L V E
- Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente el escrito presentado por el ciudadano Fernando Carrillo Florez.
- Segundo. Informar al peticionario que contra el presente auto, no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.