JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 12, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Graciela Dolores Leyton

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil Familia, para que dirima el conflicto de competencia y decida cuál de los dos juzgados debe conocer y tramitar la acción de tutela impetrada por la ciudadana de la referencia contra la Caja de Crédito Agrario, Industrial y Minero en liquidación, lo anterior porque la mencionada Corporación es el superior jerárquico común al que le corresponde resolver el asunto.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E:
  2. REMITIR el expediente de la referencia a la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil Familia, para que dicha Corporación dirima el conflicto de competencia y decida cuál de los dos juzgados debe conocer y tramitar la acción de tutela impetrada por Graciela Dolores Leytón contra la Caja de Crédito Agrario, Industrial y Minero en liquidación
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.