JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 31, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Lucas Rojas Quinoya

✓
Topic · hard data
Notificacion Por Telegrama. Impugnacion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impugnación Fallo De Tutela
  • Trámite por presentación oportuna
  • Término para interponerla en caso de notificación por telegrama
Fallo De Tutela
  • Notificación a través de medio efectivo que garantice el derecho de defensa
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente de tutela de la referencia al Juzgado respectivo para que dé trámite a la impugnación presentada dentro del término legal, por la Superintendencia de Sociedades.

Resuelto el recurso, devuélvase el expediente a la Corte Constitucional para su eventual revisión, tal como lo ordenan los artículos 86 de la Constitución Política y 32, inciso segundo del Decreto 2591 de 1991.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITASE por la Secretaria General de la Corte, el expediente de tutela No. T-200.669 al Juzgado 29 Civil del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, para que se de tramite a la impugnacion presentada dentro del termino legal, por la Superintendencia de Sociedades.
  2. Segundo. Resuelto el recurso, DEVUELVASE el presente expediente a la Corte Constitucional para su eventual revision, tal como lo ordenan los articulos 86 de la Constitucion Politica y 32, inciso
  3. segundo. del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Antonio Barrera Carbonell
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 1cited by 3 →A. 033/99A. 013/94 — Termino De La Notificacion Por Telegrama. · cited 10 timesA. 013/941994T-385/16 — Accion De Tutela En Materia De Compartibilidad Y Compatibilidad Pensional. Procedencia Excepcional Ante Perjuicio Irremediable. · cited 15 timesT-385/162016A. 229/03 — Nulidad Sentencia T-537/03 · cited 13 timesA. 229/032003T-060/11 · cited 4 timesT-060/112011
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites1
Cited by3

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.