JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 13, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Aura Maria Becerra Fajardo Vs. Juzgado Septimo Civil Municipal De Descongestion De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado 29 Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y La Sala Civil Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De La Misma Ciudad. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Sala Civil Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogota.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Bogota, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Aura Maria Becerra Fajardo, contra el Juzgado 7 Civil Municipal de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Juzgado 29 Civil del Circuito de Bogota, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.