JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente proveído la Sala Tercera de Revisión dispuso mantener la suspensión de términos decretada mediante Auto 548/19 hasta por sesenta días más, contados a partir de la notificación de la presente providencia

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. UNICO. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el inciso
  2. segundo. del articulo 64 del Acuerdo 02 de 2015, MANTENER LA SUSPENSION DE TERMINOS dentro del expediente T-7.395.713, decretada por medio del Auto 548 de 2019, hasta por sesenta (60) dias mas contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela