JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓Claimant Eduardo Luis Pacheco Juviano·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración, corrección o adición
Nombramiento De Notarios En Propiedad
  • Efectos inter comunis otorgados en sentencia SU913/09
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por cuanto no corresponde a la Corte pronunciarse sobre organización, localización y distribución de notarías en el país en sentencia SU913/09
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El actor solicita se precise el alcance de la sentencia SU-913-03, de manera que se realicen exclusivamente los nombramientos que aún faltan para restablecer los derechos de quienes habían sido excluidos, en una de las notarías actualmente vacantes.

La Corte considera que la solicitud del peticionario no está dirigida a controvertir la claridad de las expresiones relacionadas con la parte resolutiva, sino a que se emita un pronunciamiento adicional que resuelva su caso particular, por lo tanto se decide denegar la solicitud.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-2210489 AC, presentada por el senor EDUARDO LUIS PACHECO JUVINAO.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.