A- de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Luis Hector Loaiza Segura
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Controversias sobre aplicación de normas legales por la DIAN
- Improcedencia por cosa juzgada absoluta
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
No se accedió a la petición formulada por el accionante, a través del recurso de súplica presentado contra el auto de la referencia, providencia que se confirmó en su integridad, toda vez que de acuerdo con lo establecido por el Art. 6º del Decreto 2067 de 1991, la Corte Constitucional debe rechazar aquellas demandas que pretendan la declaración de inexequibilidad de "normas amparadas por una sentencia que hubiere hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada o respecto de las cuales sea manifiestamente incompetente".
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- NO ACCEDER a la peticion formulada por el ciudadano Luis Hector Loaiza Segura, a traves del recurso de suplica presentado contra el auto de 24 de febrero de 2000 visible a folios 75 y 76 del expediente, providencia que se confirma en su integridad.
- Notifiquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.