JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Luis Carlos Sachica Aponte

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Interpuesto Contra El Auto Del 11 De Enero De 2007 De Rechazo De La Demanda, Dictado Por El Magistrado Ponente Dr. Rodrigo Escobar Gil. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuestionar consideraciones del auto inadmisorio
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Por las razones estudiadas, CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 11 de enero de 2007, proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Sustanciador en el proceso D-6572, doctor Rodrigo Escobar Gil, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Luis Carlos Sachica Aponte, en contra de la Ley 964 de 2005.
  2. SEGUNDO. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.