JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Ricardo Anaya

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 18 De Diciembre De 2006 De Rechazo De La Demanda, Proferido Por La Magistrada Sustanciadora Dra. Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez. Demandas De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Sentencias De La Corte Constitucional. Incompetencia De La Corte Constitucional Para Conocer Demandas De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Sentencias Proferidas Por Esta Misma Corporacion. Confirma Auto De Rechazo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para conocer demanda contra sentencia de constitucionalidad
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Negado por incompetencia de la Corte Constitucional para conocer demanda contra sentencia de constitucionalidad
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido por la Magistrada Clara Inés Vargas Hernández el dieciocho ( 18 ) de Diciembre de 2006 dentro del proceso de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.