JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 30, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Alberto Bravo Borda

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 19 De Diciembre De 2007 Proferido Por La Magistrada Ponente Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez Que Nego La Solicitud De Suspension Del Proceso De La Referencia Y La Acumulacion Del Mismo Con El Expediente Lat-319. Improcedencia Del Recurso De Suplica Contra Un Auto Que Niega La Suspension De Un Proceso De Constitucionalidad. Rechazado Por Improcedente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Admisibilidad
  • Contra auto de rechazo procede recurso de súplica
  • Régimen procedimental de los juicios y actuaciones que deben surtirse ante la Corte Constitucional previsto en el Decreto 2067 de 1991
Recurso De Suplica
  • Procedencia contra auto que rechaza demanda
  • Improcedencia para autos en el trámite de constitucionalidad
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente el "recurso de suplica" presentado por el ciudadano Alberto Bravo Borda contra el auto de Diciembre diecinueve (19) de 2007, proferido por la Magistrada Sustanciadora en el proceso de la referencia, Dra. Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.