JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 8, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Ernesto Vargas Cuellar

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Ex Empleado Caja Agraria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Provocación innecesaria puede constituir dilación injustificada
Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial surgido entre dos Juzgado de Familia de Bogotá y de Pitalito, Huila, toda vez que es su superior jerárquico común, en consecuencia, se ordenó enviar el expediente a la mencionada Sala para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR que la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial surgido entre el Juzgado 12 de Familia de Santafe de Bogota y el Juzgado 2o Promiscuo de Familia de Pitalito, Huila.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR el envio del expediente a la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.