JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 24, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Defensor Del Pueblo·Respondent Gobernador De San Andres

✓
Topic · hard data
Competencia Para La Interpretacion Y Cumplimiento De Los Fallos De La Corte Constitucional.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cumplimiento Sentencias De Revision De Tutela
  • Corresponde al juez de primera instancia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó la petición del Procurador Delegado para Asuntos Ambientales y Agrarios, toda vez que no le corresponde a esta Corte pronunciarse acerca de lo decidido por el Tribunal de la referencia al resolver la acción de cumplimiento instaurada por el actor, ni señalar directrices u orientaciones en cuanto a las acciones que en cumplimiento de sus funciones deba adelantar la mencionada Procuraduría.

Se ordenó enviar copia de esta providencia al Tribunal competente para los fines a que haya lugar.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E:
  2. Primero. NEGAR la peticion del doctor Julio Cesar Rodas Monsalve, Procurador Delegado para Asuntos Ambientales y Agrarios.
  3. Segundo. Enviese copia de esta providencia a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cartagena, para los fines a que haya lugar.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.