JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Leticia Esther Hernandez Campo En Representacion De Su Hija Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Manizales Y El Juzgado Primero Administrativo Del Cuircuito De Manizales. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Segundo Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Manizales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De Informalidad De La Accion De Tutela
  • Ejercicio del derecho de acceso a la administración de justicia
Accion De Tutela De Menor De Edad Contra Seguro Social
  • Competencia de Juzgado Penal del Circuito Especializado
Acción De Tutela
  • Corte Constitucional no puede ser permisiva con la dilación de términos ni la renuencia de las autoridades
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Garantía de la efectividad de los derechos e imperiosa necesidad de que toda determinación esté debidamente motivada
Juez De Tutela
  • Especialidad penal que en la jurisdicción ordinaria tiene ese despacho judicial en nada afecta su competencia
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • Ejercicio excepcional de jueces y corporaciones que deban proferir decisiones de tutela
8 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito Especializado de Manizales, que de forma inmediata, inicie el tramite de la accion de tutela de la referencia y profiera la decision de instancia que corresponda, conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.