JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 10, 1993

A- de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Cabrales Sossa Rene

✓
Topic · hard data
No Sustentacion De La Impugnacion. Informalidad De La Accion De Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impugnación Fallo De Tutela
  • No requiere sustentación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ordenó a la Secretaría General de la Corporación remitir el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Montería para que resuelva la impugnación presentada contra la decisión del Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Montería.

En este sentido, la Corte Constitucional advierte que no es procedente adelantar la revisión de las providencias proferidas por no haberse resuelto la impugnación formulada.

El asunto, es devuelto al Consejo de Estado para que decida sobre la impugnación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se remita el expediente de tutela No. 18257 al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Montería para que resuelva sobre la impugnación presentada contra la decisión del Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Montería proferida dentro de la acción de la referencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR esta decisión al Juzgado
  4. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Montería.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.