JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 25, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Carlos Alfredo Ramirez Guerrero

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto De Noviembre 8 De 2004, Proferidos Por La Magistrada Sustanciadora Doctora Clara Ines Vargas Hernández De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • No competencia de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional para determinar la admisión o rechazo de cargos
  • Existencia de cosa juzgada
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido por la Magistrada Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez el ocho ( 8 ) de noviembre de 2004, numeral primero, por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda instaurada por el ciudadano Carlos Alfredo Ramirez Guerrero, por el cargo atinente a la violacion del articulo 29 Constitucional.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar a la Secretaria General la remision del expediente de la referencia al Despacho de la Magistrada Sustanciadora , para los fines expuestos en esta providencia.
  3. Tercero. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.