JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Aurelio Ignacio Cadavid Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Tramite De Incidentes De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006. Recurso De Reposicion Contra Los Autos Nos. 358 Y 359 De 2006 Que Separaron Del Conocimiento Del Proceso A Dos Magistrados. En El Caso De Las Decisiones Tomadas Mediante Los Autos, En Ninguno De Los Dos Casos Se Afecto La Pluralidad Minima Necesaria Para La Toma De La Decision Por Mayoria, Por Lo Que No Se Requeria La Designacion De Conjueces. Rechaza El Recurso De Reposicion Interpuesto
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conjuez En Procesos De La Corte Constitucional
  • No designación al haber prosperado recusación de Magistrado
Recurso De Reposicion Contra Auto Que Resolvio Recusacion De Magistrado De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazo por improcedente
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Rechazar el recurso de reposicion interpuesto por el ciudadano Aurelio Ignacio Cadavid Lopez contra los Autos Nos. 358 y 359 de seis (6) de diciembre de dos mil seis (2006).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Impedido
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 2cited by 0 →A. 011/07C-037/96 — Proyecto De Ley N°58/94 Senado Y 264/95 Camara Estatutaria De La Admon De Justicia. Exequibles E Inexequibles. · cited 1,231 timesC-037/961996C-355/06 — Aborto. Casos En Que No Constituye Delito · cited 265 timesC-355/062006
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites2
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.