A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
✓Claimant Otoniel Zabala Caraballo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por falta de legitimación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia SU.573/17.
El memorialista argumentó la existencia de una incongruencia entre las consideraciones y la parte resolutiva del fallo en mención.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide RECHAZAR la aclaración invocada, luego de verificar que el peticionario no tiene legitimación en la causa para actuar en la causa.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por falta de legitimacion en la causa la solicitud de aclaracion presentada por PRODETUR SAC (en liquidacion), a traves de su apoderado judicial, senor Otoniel Zabala Caraballo, contra la Sentencia SU-573 de 2017.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.