JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 29, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De Sentencia T-739/98
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para absolver consultas que formulen los ciudadanos
Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó la petición de aclaración de la Sentencia T-739/98, no sin antes señalar que la parte resolutiva de la mencionada providencia es clara en las órdenes de amparo que se impartieron en favor de la actora, en el proceso de revisión de tutela de la referencia.

En consecuencia, se ordenó comunicar al Juzgado competente para que verifique el cumplimiento del fallo proferido por esta Sala, y adopte las medidas que sean del caso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. Primero. NEGAR la peticion de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-739 de 1.998, por las razones senaladas en esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR que por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, se comunique el presente Auto al Juzgado
  4. Septimo. Laboral del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, a fin de que verifique de inmediato el cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-738 de 1998, proferida por esta Sala, y adopte las medidas que sean del caso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.