JurídicoESEN

Dissenting and concurring opinions by Alberto Rojas Ríos

Decisions in which Alberto filed a dissenting or concurring opinion. 782 in total.

The record of separate opinions is reliable from ~2000. Earlier dissents may be incomplete in the data.
Back to profileRecusals and absences
A. 609A/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 609/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
A. 586/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 565/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 560/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion

Read the dissenting opinion →
A. 523/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 398/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 387/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 349/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion

Prevalencia De La Jurisdicción Especial Para La Paz Por Hechos Relacionados Con El Conflicto Armado-Competencia De La Jep Para El Trámite De Solicitud De Libertad Condicionada De Exintegrante De Las Farc- Nulidad Por Falta De Competencia Funcional De La Justicia Ordinaria.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 282/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 281/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 262/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 224/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 155/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion

Elementos Que Configuran Un Conflicto De Competencia Entre Jurisdicciones-La Jurisdicción Especial Para La Paz (Jep) Es La Competente Para Dictar Medidas Cautelares Sobre El Inventario De Bienes De Las Farc Que Serán Objeto De Extinción De Dominio.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 134/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 111/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
A. 096/19Order (Auto)2019Dissenting opinion

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
A. 053/19Order (Auto)2019Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-447/18Tutela2018Dissenting opinion

Sistema De Seguridad Social Integral De Madres Comunitarias Y Sustitutas. Precedente Su.079/18.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-440/18Tutela2018Dissenting opinion

Pension De Sobrevivientes Y Principio Del Interes Superior Del Menor.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-426/18Tutela2018Concurring opinion

Inclusion En Nomina De Pensionados.

Read the concurring opinion →
T-414/18Tutela2018Concurring opinion

Accion De Tutela Para Reclamar Derechos Pensionales. Improcedencia Por Cuanto No Se Demostro Perjuicio Irremediable.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-409/18Tutela2018Concurring opinion

Accion De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Procedencia Por Defectos Sustantivo Y Desconocimiento Del Precedente Para Reconocimiento De Pension De Sobrevivientes A Conyuge Superstite.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-384/18Tutela2018Dissenting opinion

Principio Del Interes Superior Del Niño Y Custodia Compartida Por Ambos Padres.

Read the dissenting opinion →
T-373/18Tutela2018Dissenting opinion

Derecho A Nueva Valoracion De La Perdida De Capacidad Laboral Para Miembros De La Fuerza Publica Y De Policia.

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →