JurídicoESEN

Dissenting and concurring opinions by Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

Decisions in which Humberto filed a dissenting or concurring opinion. 322 in total.

The record of separate opinions is reliable from ~2000. Earlier dissents may be incomplete in the data.
Back to profileRecusals and absences
T-719/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-698/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-681/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-657/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-655/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-650/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-614/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-585/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-583/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-581/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-572/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-559/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-516/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-492/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-453/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-431/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-430/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-385/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion

Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-382/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-328/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-326/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-291/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-287/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-237/11Tutela2011Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-236/11Tutela2011Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →