JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 23, 2004

T-921 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Alirio Cordero Garavito Vs. Famisanar

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud En Conexidad Con La Vida De Afiliado Con Vih A Quien La Entidad Le Niega El Suministro De Suplementos Alimenticios No Pos. Negación De La Tutela Por Ausencia Comprobada De Afectación A La Salud Y La Vida. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Enfermo De Sida
  • Improcedencia de entrega de suplemento alimenticio
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 29 de junio de 2004 del Juzgado Veintiocho Civil Municipal de Bogotá, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.