JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 27, 2001

T-904 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jose Ancizar Alvarez Cardenas Vs Fiscalia 31 Seccional Y Otro·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Derecho A La Libertad Y Defensa. No Citación Para Notificacion Personal De Las Decisiones Dentro Del Proceso Penal. El Defensor No Se Preocupo Por Defender Sus Intereses. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Defensor En Proceso Penal
  • Actuaciones deben valorarse en el contexto del proceso
Notificacion En Proceso Penal
  • No se pueden maximizar exigencias cuando el procesado trata de sustraerse al cumplimiento de una medida de aseguramiento
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 16 de febrero de 2001 por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Ibagué y la sentencia proferida el 3 de abril de 2001 por la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia y, en consecuencia, negar la tutela de los derechos fundamentales de libertad, defensa y debido proceso de José Ancízar Álvarez Cárdenas.
  2. Segundo. Líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.