JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 15, 1999

T-684 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Vanegas Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Debido Proceso. Der. Al Trabajo. No Se Nombro A Los Ganadores Del Concurso Para Docentes Por Nulidad Del Concurso. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por inexistencia de un derecho cierto e indiscutible a ocupar cargo sometido a concurso
  • Procedencia para ocupar cargo sometido a concurso no obstaculizado por irregularidades en el desarrollo
Medio De Defensa Judicial Eficaz
  • Derecho a ocupar cargo sometido a concurso obstaculizado por irregularidades en el desarrollo
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Santafe de Bogota D.C., los dias 23 y 29 de abril de 1999, en el sentido de negar la solicitud de amparo hecha por Carlos Alberto Vanegas (expediente T-218979) y Nelson Eduardo Rodriguez Montana (expediente T-219716) contra la Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas de esta ciudad.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.