JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 22, 2002

T-679 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Paola Andrea Lugo Calderon Vs. Ministerio De Educacion Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad Y Educacion. Plan De Contingencia Para Continuar Estudios. Transferencia De Estudiantes. Trato Discriminatorio. Universidad Antonio Nariño. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • No tiene competencia para pronunciarse sobre asuntos que corresponden a otros órganos del Estado
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmar la sentencia de fecha veinticinco (25) de abril de dos mil dos (2002), del Consejo Suprior de la Judicatura, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, en la acción de tutela presentada por Paola Andrea Lugo Calderón contra el Ministerio de Educación Nacional y el Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior -ICFES.
  2. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.