JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 3, 2008

T-676 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Sandra Maria Marulanda Ramirez·Respondent Susalud Eps

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por cuanto el rechazo a la afiliación a la EPS no compromete la salud, ni viola la libertad de escogencia a una entidad de salud
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida digna y a la salud de persona y su nucleo familiar a quienes les fue negada su solicitud de afiliacion a la entidad, dada la presunta vigencia de su vinculacion con la eps del seguro social.

(multiafiliacion).<br>caso concreto: Improcedencia de la accion de tutela.

Esta corporacion no halla elementos probatorios que respalden el supuesto factico expuesto, de manera que no existe fundamento para atribuir responsabilidad a la entidad accionada ni para concluir que de ella se deriva la vulneracion de los derechos fundamentales de la actora.<br>negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Décimo. Penal Municipal de Medellín -con función de control de garantías-, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Reporting justice
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Mauricio González Cuervo
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →T-676/08T-427/22 — Seguridad Social En Pensiones-Devolución De Saldos En El Régimen De Ahorro Individual Con Solidaridad. · cited 4 timesT-427/222022
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.