JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 16, 2005

T-638 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Lucelly Marin Castaño Vs. Saludcoop

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por pago de licencia de maternidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho de peticion de afiliada a quien la entidad se niega a reconocerle y pagarle la licencia de maternidad por la extemporaneidad en los pagos efectuados por el empleador razon por la que éste le pago la licencia mientras se adelantaban los tramites ante saludcoop.

Solicita se ordene el reconocimiento y pago de la licencia de maternidad.

Hecho superado por la cancelación de la licencia a favor del empleador de la señora marin castaño.

Negada por hecho superado

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. LEVANTAR la suspensión de términos en este proceso, ordenada mediante el auto de fecha 26 de Mayo de 2005.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la decisión proferida por el Juzgado
  3. Quinto. Penal Municipal de Armenia, pero por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.