JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 1, 2002

T-588 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Valencia Cano Vs. Fondo Para La Reconstruccion Del Eje Cafetero

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Igualdad Vivienda Digna Debido Proceso Y Peticion. Solicitud Subsidio Para Adquision De Inmueble A Familias No Propietarias Ni Poseedoras. Poder Legitimo. Forec. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Actuacion Legitima De Autoridad Administrativa
  • Se niega subsidio para adquisición de inmueble
Fondo Para La Reconstruccion Y Desarrollo Social Del Eje Cafetero
  • Censo de familias afectadas
  • Otorgamiento de subsidios para adquisición de inmuebles
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. No tutelar los derechos a la igualdad, a la vivienda digna, a la igualdad y de peticion al actor Carlos Arturo Valencia Cano.
  2. Segundo. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 29 de enero de 2002 por el Tribunal Administrativo del Quindio y la sentencia proferida el 14 de marzo de 2002 por la Seccion Tercera de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado.
  3. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.