JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 29, 1996

T-573 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Jose Osorio Parejo

✓
Topic · hard data
Suministro De Medicamentos Por El I.S.S. Formulados Por Medicos No Vinculados Al I.S.S. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Instituto De Seguros Sociales
  • Suministro medicamentos por profesionales de planta
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo dictado por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala Laboral, el once (11) de junio de 1996, que a su vez confirmo el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Barranquilla, el treinta (30) de abril del mismo ano, que denego la tutela presentada por el ciudadano Jose Osorio Parejo, contra el Instituto de los Seguros Sociales, Seccional Atlantico, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Atlantico que disponga lo conducente para que el senor Jose Osorio Pareja sea examinado por especialistas psiquiatricos a fin de determinar su estado de salud, y adoptar el tratamiento adecuado, para su recuperacion.
  4. Tercero. LIBRENSE por secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.