JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 30, 1994

T-541 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant William Vergara Oñate

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Recurso De Apelacion. Devolucion De Automotor Por La Admon De Aduanas De Santa Marta. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMASE la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Santa Marta, de fecha siete (7) de julio de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994). Por consiguiente, no se concede la tutela solicitada por el señor WILLIAM VERGARA OÑATE.
  3. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente sentencia al Juzgado
  4. Primero. Civil Municipal de Santa Marta, para que sea notificada a las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.