JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 17, 1993

T-536 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Edgar Aranda Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida. Derecho A La Propiedad. Serv. Publico Domiciliario De Energia. Traslado De Subestacion Electrica. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Servicio Publico De Energia
  • Ubicación de subestación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado Municipal de Santana-Boyacá y Cívil del Circuito de Moniquirá-Boyacá, conforme a la parte motiva de esta Providencia. En su lugar, negar la solicitud de tutela interpuesta por Edgar Hernando Aranda, Martin Tamayo y Emma viuda de Angulo, en contra de las Electrificadoras de Santander y Boyacá.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR el presente fallo a la Oficina de Planeación Municipal de Santana-Boyacá, en virtud de las consideraciones expresadas en esta Providencia.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNIQUESE la decisión al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Santana-Boyacá, para que notifique a las partes, conforme lo dispone el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.