JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 1994

T-534 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Francisco Galeano Benavides

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Inexistencia De Indefension. Fallo De Tutela Dentro De Una Inspeccion Judicial.Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Revócase la determinación tomada por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Santa Rosa del Sur, dentro de una inspección judicial el 11 de diciembre de 1992 en el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Remítase copia del expediente al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Departamento de Bolívar para que examine la conducta del Juez Promiscuo Municipal de Santa Rosa del Sur Dr. Howarad Puello Jurado en la tramitación de esta tutela.
  3. TERCERO. Notifíquese al petente, a Gumercinda Alvarado, al Defensor del Pueblo y al Tribunal de Cartagena.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.